FORMATION OF STUDENTS’ SKILLS FOR ESTABLISHING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE COMMUNICATIVE BEHAVIOR OF A PERSON AND THE DEGREE OF THE MESSAGES INTERPRETATION ADEQUACY

The article describes the essence and structure of an individual's communicative behavior and substantiates the influence of the nature of this behavior on the degree of the messages interpretation adequacy. The influence of the speech situation factors on the transformation of the utterance meaning is described. It is concluded that adequate understanding requires a mental transformation of statements (establishing equivalence with a number of other statements about an event/fact), taking into account all factors of the speech situation, including the goals of the interlocutor. The side effects of perception leading to inadequate interpretation of the interlocutor's communicative behavior are revealed. It is shown how the measure and degree of attribution depend on the development of self-control and reflection skills, as well as on understanding the mechanism of occurrence of perception side effects, such as, for example, the "halo effect" and the "novelty effect". A plan for analyzing the subject's communicative behavior is proposed, taking into account possible failures in the work of cognitive mechanisms. The directions of educational work and types of tasks for the formation of students' skills to establish the relationship between the communicative behavior of a person and the degree of the imessages interpretation adequacy are presented. The results of the study can be used in the development of lesson plans, the organization of independent and research work of students, writing scenarios for educational activities.

1. Prohorov Yu. E., Sternin I. A. Russians : communicative behavior. Moscow: Flinta : Nauka, 2011. 326 p.

2. Maslova V. A. Linguoculturology. Moscow: Akademiya, 2001. 208 p.

3. Leech G. N. Principles of Pragmatics. London; New York: Rutledge, 2016. 264 p.

4. Grice P. Logic and Conversation. Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech acts ; еd. by P. Cole and J. L. Morgan. 1975: 41-58.

5. Pease A., Garner A. Talk Language. URL: https://eragozina.nethouse.ru/static/doc/0000/0000/0018/18861.vj2z8efh4q.PDF

6. Leontyev A. A. Fundamentals of psycholinguistics. Moscow: Smysl, 1997. 287 p.

7. Dmitrieva A. A., Mironenko N. V. Linguistic features and communicative distortions in modern media journalism. The science of the young: challenges and prospects. Velikiy Novgorod, 2024: 17-21.

8. Almyasheva N. S Gender differences in communication processes. Russian Science: actual research and development. Part 1. Samara; 2022: 124-127. DOI 10.46554/Russian.science-2022/09-1-124/127.

9. Kartashkova F. I. Human communicative behavior: perspectives of study at the Ivanovo Scientific School. Mir lingvistiki i kommunikacii = The world of linguistics and communication. 2023; (73): 110-126. (In Russ.).

10. Kelly G. A. Personality psychology. The theory of personal constructs. St. Petersburg: Rech, 2000. 248 p.

11. Andreeva G. M. The place of interpersonal perception in the system of perceptual processes and the features of its content. Interpersonal perception in a group. Moscow, 1981. Р. 26-36.

12. Gilyazova D. R. The study of the role of communication in the generation and entrenchment of stereotypes. Linguistic units in the light of modern scientific paradigms. Ufa, 2024: 147-151.

13. Bodalev A. A. Perception and understanding of a person by a person. Moscow; 1982. 200 p.

14. Gozman L. Ya. The psychology of emotional relationships. Moscow: MGU; 1987. 175 p.

15. How to recognize a liar. Verbal signs of lying. URL: https//psy-ask.ru/kak-raspoznat-lzhetsa.html

16. Tsoupikova E. V. Development of skills of manipulative influences recognition and neutralization: logical and psychosemantic aspects of perception of text messages. Omsk; 2012. 304 p.