SUPERVISION AS A CONDITION FOR SUCCESSFUL ADAPTATION OF STUDENTS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF FACILITATED TRAINING AT THE UNIVERSITY

The article analyzes the influence and importance of the curator’s work in the successful adaptation of students at the university. The purpose of this article is to substantiate the implementation of curatorial work with students at the university as one of the conditions for successful adaptation of students at the university based on the implementation of facilitative learning aimed at independent and meaningful mastery of knowledge by students at the university. The article provides an analysis of the domestic and foreign experience of curation and facilitation training. The article presents the psychological and pedagogical requirements for a curator and a teacher-facilitator in Russian pedagogy: personal qualities, mastery of techniques and techniques of communication with students, methods of facilitation (speech influence). The advantages of curation based on facilitative learning are revealed. Based on the study of literature, questionnaires, and practical experience, a model of the curator’s activity was created. The functions (informative, organizational, communicative, controlling, creative), characteristics (purposefulness, motivation, effectiveness), stages of activity of the curator of the student group are highlighted and justified. In accordance with the effectiveness criterion, the levels of professional and pedagogical activity of the curator are revealed.

The results of the study can be used in the management of extracurricular and educational activities of the university and educational work with students by the university administration and teachers in practical classes, and in classes on the control of independent work at the university.

1. Adonina L. V., Vishnyakova A. V., Kuzema T. B. Pedagogical facilitation and its components. E-SCIO. 2020; 9: 309-316. (In Russ.).

2. Pundik I. Ya. Facilitating function of pedagogical technologies in the activities of a university teacher. Yaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik = Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2009; 2 (59): 119-123. (In Russ.).

3. Romashina S. Ya., Mayer A. A. Facilitative pedagogy in higher education. Professional`noe obrazovanie v Rossii i za rubezhom = Professional education in Russia and abroad. 2012; 6: 45-49. (In Russ.).

4. Modern educational technologies / Ed. N.V. Bordovskaya. M.: KNORUS, 2010. 432 p.

5. Johnson, N. Five Strategies and Ten Tools to Facilitate Learning. 2012.

6. Weimer M. Learner-Centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice. San Francisco, John Wiley and Sons. 2013.

7. Medvedeva I. L., Musatkina B. V. Management of extracurricular activities of the university and educational work with students: monograph. M.: RUSAINS, 2018. 172 p.

8. Medvedeva I. L. Quality management of educational work in a university as a tool for shaping the personality of a future specialist // Problems and ways of development of professional education in the Russian Federation: collection of reports of the All-Russian Federation. Scientific and methodological conference. Irkutsk, 2019. pp. 229-233.