Preview

Herald of Siberian Institute of Business and Information Technologies

Advanced search

COMPETENCE OF CHAIRMEN OF COURTS OF GENERAL JURISDICTION IN THE FIELD OF JUDICIAL PROTECTION IN THE EAEU COUNTRIES: COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS

https://doi.org/10.24412/2225-8264-2023-3-154-157

Abstract

The strengthening of State sovereignty is closely related to justice as a type of State and administrative activity. The authority of justice is directly related to trust in the judicial system, courts and judges. The competence of the court covers not only the aspects of the functioning of the state, it covers all aspects of the life of every citizen and associations of citizens on economic, political, social, cultural platforms. Using the example of the legal status of the chairmen of district courts as the courts closest to the population in the EAEU countries, the author analyzes the transformation of their competence and powers in the field of judicial protection.
The importance of the competence of the chairmen of the courts in organizing the activities of the courts in the field of information policy of the judicial system, the prompt and high-quality introduction of information technologies into the work of the courts, objective informing the public about judicial activities, increasing people’s confidence in the law and the court is noted.

About the Author

V. A. Skorev
Сибирский институт бизнеса и информаионных технологий
Russian Federation

Vasily A. Skorev, Employee of the joint press service of the courts of the Omsk region

 


References

1. Organization and activities of courts of general jurisdiction: novelties and prospects: monograph / V. P. Kashepov, A. A. Gravina, O. V. Makarova, etc.; resp. ed. V. P. Kashepov. — M.: Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation: Law firm CONTRACT, 2016. — 240 p.

2. Makarova O. V. The Institute of Court Chairmen as an element of organizing the activities of courts of general jurisdiction // Journal of Russian Law. 2017. No. 6 (246). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/institut-predsedateleysudov-kak-element-organizatsii-deyatelnosti-sudov-obschey-yurisdiktsii (date of access: 09/24/2023). (75). pp. 209–218.

3. Momotov V.V. Judicial reform of 2018 in the Russian Federation: concept, goals, content (part 1) // Journal of Russian Law. 2018. No. 10 (262). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sudebnaya-reforma-2018-goda-v-rossiyskoyfederatsii-kontseptsiya-tseli-soderzhanie-chast-i (date of access: 09/24/2023).

4. Kondrashev A. A. Judicial reform in Russia: problems of implementation and solutions // Current problems of Russian law. 2017. No. 2.

5. Temporary procedure for organizing work on creating accounts, creating and maintaining official pages on the social network of federal courts of general jurisdiction, federal arbitration courts, magistrates, the Judicial Department of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the departments of the Judicial Department in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, approved by order of the Judicial Department at the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation URL: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/405880193/ (access date 10/02/2023).


Review

For citations:


Skorev V.A. COMPETENCE OF CHAIRMEN OF COURTS OF GENERAL JURISDICTION IN THE FIELD OF JUDICIAL PROTECTION IN THE EAEU COUNTRIES: COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS. Herald of Siberian Institute of Business and Information Technologies. 2023;12(3):154-157. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24412/2225-8264-2023-3-154-157

Views: 145


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-8264 (Print)