A NEW DIRECTION OF METHODOLOGICAL WORK IN TEACHING CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

Abstract

The authors of the article analyze a non-standard variant of the methodological support of the educational process through the presentation of the personalities of the most interesting personality, namely the professor of the department of criminal procedure of the Federal State Educational Institution of Higher Education «Omsk Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia», candidate of legal sciences, professor V.V. Kalnitsky. They claim that V.V. Kalnitsky invented an interesting new method of communicating educational material to his teachers, such as publishing articles for students in a scientific and practical journal. According to the results of the study, it was revealed that for 10 years Professor V.V. Kalnitsky in the journal «Legislation and Practice», published on the basis of the Omsk Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 13 articles were published in a special section «To help students of the criminal process». A conversation with the author of the articles led to the conclusion that the choice of a scientific and methodological issue for coverage in the article is defined by him as an identified problematic that is difficult for students in mastering such an academic discipline as criminal procedure, and from communicating with fellow lawyers and teachers of criminal - legal disciplines of both the Omsk Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia and other educational institutions of higher education. The analysis of the new methodological work was organized in two directions: logical and methodical. In terms of logic, the authors of the article managed to identify four main features that are characteristic of V.V. Kalnitsky when writing articles. When identifying the methodological «know-how» of Professor Kalnitsky, the authors of the article saw that he tends to rely on eight methodological techniques, among which the techniques stand out: «keeping the topic», using the enumeration method when designating the features of a legal phenomenon and demonstrative knowledge of the legal language.