TRANSFORMATION OF SCIENTIFIC, TECHNOLOGICAL AND FINANCIAL RISKS OF TECHNOLOGICAL INTEGRATION OF PROCESSING INDUSTRY ENTERPRISES

The transformation of scientific, technological and financial risks of technological integration has become a prerequisite for the sustainable development of manufacturing enterprises. The purpose of this study is to study the current state of innovation, to identify threats to the scientific and technical potential of industrial companies. The theoretical considerations and conclusions relate to options for securing enterprise sustainability. Among them, one can single out the regulation of the financial status of an organization in accordance with the development trends of the national economy, an increase in the level of institutional development, the generation of economic growth through

«continuous innovation», «Human Resource Management», financial policy and «operational leverage». Based on the processing of statistical information, the author identifies the characteristic features of the of the «PreCOVID» and

«PostCOVID» economies. Among them, there is a positive trend of investment in R&D; growth of state sources of financing for innovative activities; positive balance of investments in new technologies and research on the part of foreign entities, despite the ongoing sanctions restrictions; growth in research and development costs from the main partners of enterprises in technological integration. The assessment of the state of small and medium innovative entrepreneurship is given; the conclusion is made about its insignificant share of innovations in the total number of small enterprises. Taking into account the simultaneous impact of external and internal crises on the management system of industrial enterprises, methods of transformation of the most typical risks of technological integration are proposed. They are grouped according to the functional purpose of the control subsystem, tied to the forms of vertical, horizontal, mixed integration of technological processes. It is concluded that for a group of scientific and technological risks as subject-object relations, it is necessary to carry out preventive measures aimed at reducing the amount of possible damage by deepening the technological chain.

1. «Gazprom» usilivayet segment biznesa po pererabotke gaza // Public Joint Stock Company «Gazprom». URL: https://www.gazprom.ru/press/news/2021/february/article523893/ (data obrashhenija 10.03.2021).

2. Zaytseva, O. P. Analiz i regulirovaniye finansovogo statusa organizatsii v sisteme antikrizisnogo upravleniya [Analysis and regulation of the financial status of the organization in the anti-crisis management system] / O. P. Zaytseva. – Tekst: neposredstvennyy // Obrazovaniye i nauka: sovremennyye trendy: kollektivnaya monografiya [Education and Science: Modern Trends: Collective Monograph]. Gl. red. O. N. Shirokov. Cheboksary, 2018, рр. 100–127.

3. Indeks predprinimatelskoy uverennosti organizatsiy obrabatyvayushchey promyshlennosti // Edinaya mezhvedomstvennaya informatsionno-statisticheskaya sistema (EMISS). URL: https://www.fedstat.ru/indicator/57754. Zagl. s ekrana (data obrashhenija 10.03.2021).

4. Kravets. M. A. Sushchnost informatsionnoy vlasti steykkholderov v sovremennykh ekonomicheskikh usloviyakh [The essence of informational power of stakeholders in modern economic conditions] / M. A. Kravets. O. Ya. Emelianova. I. V. Shershen. Sovremennaya ekonomika: problemy i resheniya [Modern economics: problems and solutions]. 2020, № 8 (128), рр. 40 – 48. DOI: 10.17308/meps.2020.8/2409.

5. Nauka i innovatsii / Federalnaya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii. URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/14477#. Zagl. s ekrana. (data obrashcheniya 03.03.2021).

6. Statistics // Ministry of Energy. URL: https://minenergo.gov.ru/en/activity/statistic. Zagl. s ekrana (data obrashhenija 10.03.2021).

7. Chung, Ch. Yo., Kim, D., Lee, Ju. Do Institutional Investors Improve Corporate Governance Quality? Evidence From the Blockholdings of the Korean National Pension Service. Global Economic Review. 2020, Vol. 49 (4), рр. 422–437. DOI: 10.1080/1226508X.2020.1798268.

8. Data and Statistics / International Energy Agency. URL: https://www.iea.org/data-and- statistics?country=WORLD&fuel=Oil&indicator=CrudeImportsExports (data obrashhenija 10.03.2021).

9. Gong, R. Short selling threat and corporate financing decisions. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2020, Vol. 118. Article number 105853. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2020.105853.

10. Hao, XC., Sun, QR., Xie, F. Does foreign exchange derivatives market promote R&D? International industry-level evidence. Economic Modelling. 2020, Vol. 91, рр. 33–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2020.05.019.

11. Hsu, S., Li, JJ., Bao, H. P2P lending in China: Role and prospects for the future. Manchester School. Jun 2020.DOI: 10.1111/manc.12332.

12. Susie, M. C., Noja, G. G., Cristea, M. Diversity, social Inclusion and Human Capital Development as Fundamentals of Financial Performance and Risk Mitigation. Amfiteatru Economic. 2020, Vol. 22 (55), рр. 742–757. DOI: 10.24818/EA/2020/55/742.

13. Tohanean, D., Buzatu, A. I., Baba, C. A., Georgescu, B. Business Model Innovation Through the Use of Digital Technologies: Managing Risks and Creating Sustainability. Amfiteatru Economic. 2020, Vol. 22 (55), рр. 758– 774. DOI: 10.24818/EA/2020/55/758.

14. Yang, W. Yо., Han, B. S. The Effects of Compliance Timing on Multinational Enterprises' Corporate Performance in China: An Application of Institutional Perspectives. Journal of Korea Trade. 2020, Vol. 24 (4), рр. 71–94. DOI: 10.35611/jkt.2020.24.4.71.

15. Zhao, K., Huang, H. H., Wu, W. S. Shareholding structure, private benefit of control and incentive intensity: from the perspective of enterprise strategic behavior. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja. AUG 2020. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2020.1805345.