MONITORING THE BURNOUT PROCESS AND SYSTEMIC FEATURES OF MOTIVATION OF A TEAM OF PROGRAMMERS

The relevance of the problem of creating reliable programs, industrial and multidisciplinary programming is growing due to the growth of the volume and complexity of automation tasks and the complication of processes and products in the software market. This is also facilitated by practical problems of the economy, production, and the provision of services focused on accounting for consumer expectations. The purpose of our study is to investigate such a multi-faceted problem as the burnout of programmers, programming groups in modern market (product) and digital conditions. The study applied methods: system analysis-synthesis, integration, decision-making methods, identification and scaling, questionnaire (testing), situational forecasting and modeling, social engineering. A systematic and comparative analysis of the goals, objectives, conditions, impacts on the effect of programmers burnout was carried out and the following main results were obtained, analysis results: 1) causes and conditions of the phenomenon of programmers burnout; 2) factors affecting burnout taking into account uncertainties and risks in the environment and the infrastructure under consideration; 3) goals of monitoring burnup and the role of the head of the programming team in reducing the burnup process; 4) the principles of motivating team members and increasing their competencies; 5) for the last type of analysis, a system of test questions (survey questionnaire) has been developed, which will identify key burnout factors and rank them by importance in the process. The significance of the research results lies both in the theoretical (system) interest in them, and in their practical orientation, in particular, in the possibility of using them to solve the problems of forming teams of programmers, conducting teamwork and motivating programmers.

1. Panachugin A. V. Determining the reliability of software in the structure of a modern information system. Kibernetika i Programmirovanie = Cybernetics and Programming. 2019; 2: 65-72. (In Russ.). DOI:10.25136/2306-4196.2019.2.20341.

2. Kuchumov I. V. Testing programs and a mathematical model for finding errors in the software complex. Izvesiya Kabardino-Balkarskogo Nauchnogo Tcentra RAN = Izvesiya Kabardino-Balkarian Scientific Center RAS. 2023; 6: 74–82. (In Russ). DOI: 10.35330/1991-6639-2023-6-116-74-82.

3. Gil’vanov R. G., Zabrodin A. V. Reliability of information systems: tutorial. St. Petersburg: PGUPS. 2022. Pp. 1-85.

4. Maksimov M. I., Gorina E. A. Agile-methodology as a driver of an effective corporate culture. Regional’naya i otraslevaya ekonomika = Regional and Industry Economy. 2023; 1: 102-111. (In Russ). DOI:10.47576/2949-1916_2023_1_102.

5. Klatta M., Westrickb A., Bawaa R., Gabrama O., Blakeb A., Emersonc B. Sustained resiliency building and burnout reduction for healthcare professionals via organizational sponsored mindfulness programming. EXPLORE 2022; (18, is. 2); 179-186. DOI: 10.1016/j.explore.2021.04.004.

6. Murav’eva О. I., Kozlova К. V. Professional burnout of programmers: specificity of the phenomenon. Sibirskii psihologicheskii gurnal = Siberian Psychological Journal. 2019; 73: 98-110. (In Russ). DOI: 10.17223/17267080/73/6.

7. Vodopj’anova N. E., Starchenkova E. S., Nasledov A. D. Standardized questionnaire «Professional burnout» for specialists in socionomic professions. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta = Bulletin Sankt-Peterburg University (ser.12), 2013; 4: 17-26. (In Russ).

8. Pol’skaya N. A., Muhametdzjanova М. N. Features of emotional regulation in connection with stress and burnout. Psihologicheskii issledovaniya = Psychological research. 2018; 61: 10-21. (In Russ). DOI: 10.54359/ps.v11i61.264.

9. Yaroshenko Е. I. Socio-psychological model of emotional burnout of personality. [Electr. Journal]. Ucennie zapiski Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Academic notes of Kursk State University. 2019; 1: 1-7. (In Russ).

10. Rodić M., Marić S. Leadership style and employee readiness: basic factors of leadership efficiency. Strategic management. 2021; 26: 53-65 DOI: 10.5937/StraMan2101053R.

11. Kaziev V., Tyutrin N., Khizbullin F., Takhumova V., Medvedeva L. Improvement and modeling of the company’s activity based on the innovative KPI system. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Science. 2018; 10 (5S): 1406-1415. (In Russ). DOI: 10.4314/jfas.v10i5s.117.

12. Stepanov D. Yu., Vel’sovskii А. V. Application of Agile Scrum in SAP Projects. Korporativnie informatsionnie sistemi = Corporate Information Systems. 2018; 1: 9-17. (In Russ).

13. Bestugev-Lada I. V. Forecasting Workbook. Moscow, 1982. 426 p.

14. Ashby N., Johnson J., Krajbich I., Wedel M. Applications and innovations of eye–movement research in judgment and decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2016; 29; 96–102.

15. Solov’eva V. A., Venig С. B., Belih Т. V. Analysis of oculomotor activity observed when studying educational material from the screen. Integratciya obrazovaniya = Integration of education. 2021; 25 (1): 91-109. (In Russ). DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.102.025.202101.091-109.

16. Viola P., Jones M. Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Kauai. Hawaii. USA; 2001; 1: 511-518.